Crime+Scene+Script

media type="custom" key="4717081"

My name is Detective Bailey Vitko. Two weeks ago I was called to a crime scene at a 2 bedroom, 1 bath beach house. The alleged victim was Felix Navidad his parents died,he inherited money from them,his friends are in his will,and he critisized people. The suspect guilty of committing this crime is Kendra. This suspect's guilt was confirmed through the testing and results of evidence collected at the crime scene.

The most incriminating piece of evidence was the powder. The evidence was found in block 6. The test performed was DNA (powders test). The results of the test were that the powder on the shoes of Kendra turned out to be black with 2 drops of iodine it could have been blood (It was found to be used to make fake blood? Why would she plant fake blood at the scene?). This connects the suspect to the crime because it was on her shoes.

The next piece of evidence collected was the finger prints. It was found in the 3rd block. The test performed was Fingerprints. The results of the test were that she touched Felix's cup her fingerprints were on it. This connects the suspect to the crime because we compared all the suspects to the ones on the cup and hers turned out.

The last piece of evidence was the letter. It was found in block 8. The test performed was DNA (Handwriting test). The results of the test were that she wrote it. (What did the note say? Which name did she sign? Why would she sign a different name?) This connects the suspect to the crime because I checked everybody's handwrinting and Kendra's was written on it.

According to the evidence, the following is an account of the events believed to have gone down on that fateful day. He was last spotted at a bus station. (This is supposed to be a step-by-step explanation of how she committed the crime that day.)

Therefore, Kendra committed the crime of Felix's pass for money.

**Rubric for Podcasts** introduction. Provides relevant information and establishes a clear purpose engaging the listener immediately. || **__Describes the topic and engages the audience as the introduction proceeds.__** || Somewhat engaging (covers well-known topic), and provides a vague purpose. || Irrelevant or inappropriate topic that minimally engages listener. Does not include an introduction or the purpose is vague and unclear. ||^  || 68% ||
 * ** CATEGORY ** || ** Exemplary **  || ** Proficient **  || ** Partially Proficient **  || ** Incomplete **  || ** POINTS **  ||
 * ** Introduction ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || Catchy and clever
 * ^  || **__Tells who is speaking, date the podcast was produced, and where the speaker is located.__**  || Tells most of the following: who is speaking, date of the podcast, and location of speaker.  || Alludes to who is speaking, date of the podcast, and location of speaker.  || Speaker is not identified. No production date or location of the speaker is provided.  ||^   ||
 * ** Content ** || ** 6 points ** || ** 4 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || The motive was detailed and clearly based on information delivered throughout the investigation.  || **__ The motive is detailed and based on partial information delivered throughout the investigation.  __** || The motive is not very detailed and is sprinkled with inaccurate information.  || The motive is missing, or unclear or all information is inaccurate.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || Four pieces of strong evidence were presented and linked to the suspect in an organized, methodical manner.  || Three or four pieces of evidence were presented and/or linked to the suspect in a somewhat organized, thoughtful manner.  || __** Two pieces of shaky evidence were presented and/or loosely linked to the suspect. Lack of organization.  **__ || One to no pieces of unimportant evidence were presented in an unorganized manner.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || The events in the scenario are detailed, extremely organized and strongly supported with evidence and facts related to the crime scene.  || The events in the scenario are well organized, somewhat detailed, and supported with evidence from the crime scene. || **__The events in the crime scene lack organization, detail, and are weakly supported with evidence from the crime scene.__** || There was no clear direction and evidence was unimportant. ||^   ||
 * ^  || Conclusion clearly summarizes key information.  || Conclusion summarizes information.  || __**Conclusion vaguely summarizes key information**__  || No conclusion is provided.  ||^   ||
 * ** Delivery ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 point ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || Well rehearsed, smooth delivery in a conversational style.  || **__Rehearsed, smooth delivery.__**  || Appears unrehearsed with uneven delivery.  || Delivery is hesitant, and choppy and sounds like the presenter is reading.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || Highly effective enunciation and presenter's speech is clear and intelligible, not distant and muddled. Expression, and rhythm keep the audience listening. || **__ Enunciation, expression, pacing are effective throughout the podcast.  __** || Enunciation, expression, rhythm are sometimes distracting during the podcast.  || Enunciation of spoken word is distant and muddled and not clear. Expression and rhythm are distracting throughout the podcast.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || Correct grammar is used throughout the podcast.  || **__Correct grammar is used during most of the podcast.__**  || Occasionally incorrect grammar is used during the podcast.  || Poor grammar is used throughout the podcast.  ||^   ||
 * ** Graphic and Music Enhancements ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || **__ Music enhances the mood, quality, and understanding of the presentation.  __** || Music provides supportive background to the podcast.  || Music provides somewhat distracting background to the podcast.  || Music is distracting to presentation.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__ All music enhancements are owned by the creator of the podcast or copyright cleared with appropriate documentation.  __** || Music enhancements are owned by the creator of the podcast or copyright cleared.  || Use of copyrighted works is questionable.  || Copyright infringement is obvious.  ||^   ||
 * ** Technical Production ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || **__Presentation is recorded in a quiet environment without background noise and distractions.__**  || Presentation is recorded in a quiet environment with minimal background noise and distractions.  || Presentation is recorded in a semi-quiet environment with some background noise and distractions.  || Presentation is recorded in a noisy environment with constant background noise and distractions.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__Transitions are smooth and spaced correctly without noisy, dead space.__**  || Transitions are smooth with a minimal amount of ambient noise.  || Transitions are uneven with inconsistent spacing; ambient noise is present.  || Transitions are abrupt and background noise needs to be filtered.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__Volume of voice, music, and effects enhance the presentation.__**  || Volume is acceptable.  || Volume is occasionally inconsistent.  || Volume changes are highly distracting.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__ Podcast length keeps the audience interested and engaged.  __** || Podcast length keeps audience listening.  || Podcast length is somewhat long or somewhat short to keep audience engaged.  || Podcast is either too long or too short to keep the audience engaged.  ||^   ||
 * ** TOTAL POINTS ** || 39/57